Trust Disputes
All of our partners have acted in trust disputes, representing both beneficiaries and trustees in cases involving family, discretionary, and corporate employee benefit trusts.
These disputes often arise from allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, mismanagement of trust assets, conflicts of interest, and disputes over the proper construction and administration of trust instruments. Whether defending trustees against claims of improper decision-making or asserting beneficiaries’ rights to information and proper distributions, we bring strategic insight and deep experience to complex trust litigation.
Many of the trust disputes we handle involve parallel proceedings in offshore jurisdictions, requiring careful coordination between legal teams across multiple courts. We are experienced in cases involving trustee removal applications, challenges to the validity of trust structures, and conflicts arising from competing claims to trust assets.
Our expertise extends to high-value family trusts, where generational wealth planning can give rise to contentious disputes, as well as corporate trusts, including employee benefit trusts, where regulatory and tax considerations play a crucial role.
News & Insights
Seladore Legal announces the arrival of David Gilmore as Partner
Seladore Legal is pleased to announce that David Gilmore has joined the firm as a Partner, further strengthening its international arbitration and cross-border disputes offering across London and Asia.
Seladore contributes to GIR Market Review: Privilege 2025
In this year’s edition of GIR Market Review: Privilege 2025 for Global Investigations Review, Dan Hudson, Kevin Kilgour and Luke Taylor explore how legal privilege is adapting to new technologies and the evolving landscape of investigations.
Seladore acts in successful Privy Council case on “just and equitable” winding up
Seladore Legal has acted for the successful Respondent in a Privy Council appeal upholding the winding-up of a Cayman exempted limited partnership on the just and equitable ground, clarifying the scope of the jurisdiction beyond traditional “quasi-partnership” cases.